Legal Opinion

Moran v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 10, 2005No. 03-04-00140-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

A jury convicted Armando Moran of murder, and the court sentenced him to fifty years in prison. In this appeal, Moran raises a single point of error contending that the trial court improperly admitted his inculpatory statements. Because we hold that Moran’s statements were the product of custodial interrogation by the police after he had invoked his right to counsel, we reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Moran’s only point of error concerns the admission of his two written statements into evidence. Moran was convicted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. In re H.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Carl Edward Heiden Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. Carl Edward Heiden Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  5. Moran v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API