Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Amendola
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 8, 1990PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.
The defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine and marihuana (G. L. c. 94 C, § 34) and possession with intent to distribute marihuana (G. L. c. 94C, § 32C). *593The defendant’s motion to suppress items found in two automobiles was denied. The Appeals Court reversed the judgments and set aside the verdicts. 26 Mass. App. Ct. 713 (1988). The case is here on the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review. We remand the case to the trial judge for further findings and rulings of law.
1. Facts.
A record of the hearing on the motions to suppress having been unavailable, the parties…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. AlvaradoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.