Legal Opinion

Terrill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1990No. 16443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

Movant, Charles Keith Terrill, appeals from a dismissal after evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion.1 Movant filed the Rule 24.0352 motion pro se on December 1, 1988. The motion court appointed counsel for movant on January 25, 1989. Dallas County prosecuting attorney filed an answer to movant’s motion and movant filed a response to the prosecutor’s answer. Movant’s response contained new or different allegations, and the motion court treat*711ed the allegations in movant’s “response” as an amendment to his original pro se motion.

Movant pled guilty to possession of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Kunkel v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. KittrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Joyce v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Nimrod v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Jakib Propst v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API