Legal Opinion

Kunkel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1989No. 16129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Clarence Earl Kunkel brings this appeal from an order dismissing his motion under Rule 24.035 1 to vacate his conviction of “sodomy and rape,” for which he is currently imprisoned. The meager record shows appellant “pled guilty” and was sentenced in 1984.

Appellant commenced the instant proceeding by filing a verified pro se motion to vacate in the circuit court July 6, 1988. That court dismissed the motion on the ground it was untimely filed, relying on Rule 24.035(i), which provides:

“If sentence is pronounced prior to January 1, 1988, and no prior motion has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Ingle v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. State v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WeemsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Suman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Dayringer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API