National Bank of Alaska v. Univentures 1231
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
National Bank of Alaska (NBA) brought an action against the State of Alaska, Uni-ventures 1231 (Univentures), Charles D. LeViege, and Lee D. Garcia to recover the amount which NBA paid on a warrant issued by the state. The superior court held that the warrant is not a negotiable instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted in Alaska, and that NBA therefore could not recover as a holder in due course under the code. NBA appeals. The sole issue on appeal is whether the superior court was correct in finding that the state treasury warrant is a non-negotiable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Hicklin v. OrbeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Prince v. LeVanAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Sanitary & Improvement District No. 32 v. Continental Western Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Wagner v. Key Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Bullock v. State, Department of Community & Regional AffairsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Bullock v. STATE, DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRSAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Wagner v. Key Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993