Legal Opinion

National Bank of Alaska v. Univentures 1231

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1992No. S-4087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

National Bank of Alaska (NBA) brought an action against the State of Alaska, Uni-ventures 1231 (Univentures), Charles D. LeViege, and Lee D. Garcia to recover the amount which NBA paid on a warrant issued by the state. The superior court held that the warrant is not a negotiable instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted in Alaska, and that NBA therefore could not recover as a holder in due course under the code. NBA appeals. The sole issue on appeal is whether the superior court was correct in finding that the state treasury warrant is a non-negotiable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hicklin v. OrbeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Prince v. LeVanAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 32 v. Continental Western Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Wagner v. Key Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bullock v. State, Department of Community & Regional AffairsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bullock v. STATE, DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRSAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wagner v. Key Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API