Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Airborne Freight Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 2001No. CIV. A. 98-6313PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, for a new trial, and/or to alter or amend the judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a new trial and for reinstatement is DENIED. In accordance with this Order, a new trial on liability only shall be held as soon as is practicable. The court’s Order is based on the following reasoning:
Following a three day trial, a jury found that defendant Airborne Express had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Frederick F. KELLER, Appellant, v. ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Margaret C. Wagner, by Her Next Friend George M. Wagner v. Fair Acres Geriatric Center. Margaret Wagner, by Her Next Friend, George M. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Auckland Semper and Eldra Semper v. Raymundo Santos and Everett Investments, Inc. D/B/A Caribbean Car RentalsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Margaret Taylor v. Alvin C. Bennett and L. C. Bennett, Margaret Taylor v. L. C. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Reinco, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- SEIDMAN v. HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- SEIDMAN v. HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025