Commonwealth v. Vazquez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this opinion we are called upon to determine whether reference to the fact that a defendant’s name appeared on a computer list of known drug dealers is sufficiently prejudicial as to require a new trial, notwithstanding curative instructions intended to countermand such prejudice. We find that the statement was irreparably prejudicial and reverse.
The instant appeal stems from the following facts. On May 25, 1990, appellant was charged with two counts of unlawful delivery. A jury trial was held on February 14, 1991. The Commonwealth called Trooper Gregory Stone who testified…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ChestnutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. StilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. LeightySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. HolderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.