Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chestnut

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1986No. 115 E.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Appellant, Stafford Chestnut, appeals by allowance Superior Court’s per curiam affirmance of several judgments of sentence by the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, 341 Pa.Super. 612, 491 A.2d 916. Appellant was tried before a jury, jointly with Harold Floyd, and convicted of charges of criminal conspiracy, possessing an instrument of crime (generally) and robbery arising out of an incident which occurred on April 27, 1981, at a Burger King restaurant in Philadelphia and of charges of criminal conspiracy, aggravated assault, possessing an instrument of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API