Legal Opinion

Winston v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1958No. 7672PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDOWELL, Judge.

This is an action on a fire insurance policy. The issues presented by the pleadings are: 1. Whether or not the building destroyed by fire was located on the property described in the policy. 2. Whether or not plaintiff had an insurable interest in such building, and, 3. Was the building, at the time the policy was issued, within the terms .of the policy or covered by the provisions thereof?

*24The cause was tried by aid of a jury and judgment rendered for plaintiffs in the sum of $500. Defendant appealed.

In addition to the $5,000 coverage on plaintiffs’ one and one-half story…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Central Surety & Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Leek v. DillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. University City, Mo. v. Home Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  5. Siegel v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DepaoliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Eaglestein v. Pacific National Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Williams v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Irelan v. Standard Mutual Association of CassvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Brattin Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Triple S. Properties, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API