Legal Opinion

Block v. Ryan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 12, 1894No. 313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Hearing on a bill of exceptions taken by the plaintiff in an action of assumpsit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. 1. If a real estate agent procures a person ready, willing and financially able to make the purchase absolutely, on the terms fixed by the principal, and the latter accepts the proposed buyer, and enters into a contract with him respecting the sale and purchase of the property, he establishes a prima facie right to his commissions.

Read the full summary

Hearing on a bill of exceptions taken by the plaintiff in an action of assumpsit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. 1. If a real estate agent procures a person ready, willing and financially able to make the purchase absolutely, on the terms fixed by the principal, and the latter accepts the proposed buyer, and enters into a contract with him respecting the sale and purchase of the property, he establishes a prima facie right to his commissions. Lemon v. Lloyd, 46 Mo. App. 452; Qreene v. Hollingshead, 40 111. App. 195, and cases cited. See also Jones v. Holladay, 2 App., D. C.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

This is an action to recover $300 under a contract for that sum for finding a purchaser for a lot which the defendant, James P. Ryon, wished to sell. Upon the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff Sigmund J. Block, proved that he was a real estate broker; that defendant requested him to find a purchaser for his lot and promised him $300 in case he did so, and that he accepted the offer and found a purchaser at defendant’s price and terms. On May 27, 1892, *285he entered into a written contract with the purchaser, one William Warren, wherein it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Glentworth v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Kimberly v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  5. Knapp v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weltman's, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  2. Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. Mid-Century, Limited v. United Cigar-Whelan St. Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API