Legal Opinion
Uhl v. Thoroughbred Technology And Telecommunications
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 26, 2002No. 01-3572PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
309 F.3d 978
Frederick A. UHL and Timothy Elzinga, on Behalf of Themselves and all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
THOROUGHBRED TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,
Cathy Mason, Intervenor/Appellant.
No. 01-3572.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued April 3, 2002.
Decided October 29, 2002.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 26, 2002.*
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Nels Ackerson, Kathleen Clubb Kauffman (argued), Ackerson Group Chartered, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Jack E. McClard, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, G.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dart v. Craigslist, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re TaylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003
- Fisher v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Reliable Money Order, Inc. v. McKnight Sales Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.