Legal Opinion

Holly v. Rolwing

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.-

This is a suit in the nature of a bill of interpleader. There is no controversy here over the pleadings. The facts upon ■which the case arises are set out in an agreed statement of facts, and may be briefly stated as follows:

Chas. G. Ross, as Collector of Revenue of Pemiscot County, filed a petition returnable to the March Term, 1932, of the circuit court of that county to enforce the collection of delinquent State and county taxes due and payable in the years 1928 and 1929 on 240 acres of land in Pemiscot County. The amount sued for was $800.91, together with penalties and costs of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAnally v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drainage District Number 23 of New Madrid County v. HetlageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Winfrey v. TrenchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API