Legal Opinion
Beeman v. Mancini
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided May 18, 2022No. 8:21-cv-00233Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ALEXIS BEEMAN, Personal Representative Of The Estate of James Beeman, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:21-cv-233-AAS F/V JUMA, and EDWARD MACCINI, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff Alexis Beeman, as personal representative of the estate of James Beeman, moves for partial summary judgment on the claim of maintenance and cure. (Docs. 31, 32). Defendant Edward Maccini opposes Ms. Beeman’s motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 33). Ms. Beeman replied to Mr. Maccini’s opposition. (Doc. 37). I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Tipton v. Bergrohr GMBH-SiegenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Jon Anthony Jauch, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Nautical Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Mario Flores v. Carnival Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.