Legal Opinion

Carl Summerhill v. Craig Klauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2015No. 64A03-1503-CT-98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge. - ■

[1] Carl Summerhill sued Craig Klauer for negligence following a collision between Summerhill’s moped and Klauer’s motorcycle. Following trial, a jury declined to find Klauer liable. Summerhill now appeals that judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence and that he was prejudiced as a result. We agree with Summerhill that' the trial court erred in excluding the testimony-of an accident reconstructionist • that Sum-merhill sought to call on his behalf. Accordingly, wé must remand for a new trial. We discuss Summerhill’s other arguments to'…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Heald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nolan Clayton v. Gregory SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. In Re: The Estate of Al Katz, and Lawrence T. Newman v. Robert W. York (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Shauntelle Esposito v. Barry Eppley, MDIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API