Legal Opinion

Doe v. Gray

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 1, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00129Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOHN DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-129-DRL-MGG ADAM GRAY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Verified Motion for an Order Allowing Plaintiffs to Proceed under Pseudonym John Doe and A.B. [DE 2]. As of this date, no Defendant has filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s Verified Motion despite being afforded ample time to do so. [See DE 11]. Therefore, the Court can only assume that Plaintiffs’ Verified Motion is unopposed. The Court cannot, however, summarily…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Jane Doe v. Jason SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Jane Doe v. City of Chicago, and Charles WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Doe v. RostkerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. ELMBROOK SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API