Legal Opinion

Azhar v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1999No. 29A02-9902-CR-96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge

Appellant-Defendant, Kathryn Azhar, appeals from the Hamilton Superior Court’s (“Superior Court”) denial of her Motion to Correct Errors and/or Belated Request for Trial De Novo following a finding of contempt entered against her by the Noblesville City Court (“City Court”).

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 24,1998, Azhar appeared pro se in the City Court before Judge Pro Tempore Brian Zaiger on a speeding violation. While she did not contest that she had been speeding on the date of the infraction, Azhar did not believe she had been traveling 52 miles per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Proctor v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Neal v. Hamilton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Matter of CraigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. MacOn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hull v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re: The Paternity of S.R.W., M.R.B. v. B.T.T. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API