Gorrill v. Goff
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentWedell, J.
My clear persuasion compels this dissent. I agree that a credit endorsement, effectually ratified, will toll the statute of limitations. I disagree with the holding of the court *771that the credit endorsement was expressly ratified. I contend mere failure to object to or protest against a credit entry made by the payee on a note, without proper authorization, will not toll the statute of limitations. I am compelled to disagree with the majority in holding the special verdict disclosed an express ratification of the credit endorsement. I am clearly of the opinion that each of the special…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Good v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Jackson v. LongwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Jordan v. Austin Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Pessemier v. ZellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Lesher v. Carbon Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.