Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gorrill v. Goff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1938No. 33,982Published

1DissentWedell, J.

My clear persuasion compels this dissent. I agree that a credit endorsement, effectually ratified, will toll the statute of limitations. I disagree with the holding of the court *771that the credit endorsement was expressly ratified. I contend mere failure to object to or protest against a credit entry made by the payee on a note, without proper authorization, will not toll the statute of limitations. I am compelled to disagree with the majority in holding the special verdict disclosed an express ratification of the credit endorsement. I am clearly of the opinion that each of the special…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Good v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Jackson v. LongwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Jordan v. Austin Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Pessemier v. ZellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Lesher v. Carbon Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API