Legal Opinion

Baker v. Berry Hill Mineral Springs Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Culpeper county. Decree in favor of one of the defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

From the decree sustaining the demurrer of the Culpeper National Bank to the original and amended bills, and dismissing the cause as to that defendant, this appeal was allowed.

The case stated is as follows: The appellants, Kate M. Baker. Mary E. Middleton and Alice Tapp, were the owners of 1,000 acres of land in Culpeper county, known as Berry Hill, upon which property there is a valuable mineral spring. In September, 1902, the appellants sold and conveyed the spring with 169 3-4 acres of the farm attached to the Berry Hill Mineral Springs Company (a West Virginia corporation having an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. D'Wolf v. RabaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Clinch Valley Coal & Iron Co. ex rel. Grove v. WillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Nash v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880
  4. Jordan v. LigganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  5. Langley v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shevel's, Inc. v. Southeastern Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. JE Robert Co. v. J. ROBERT CO., INC. OF VA.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Dorr v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. White Sewing Machine Co. v. Gilmore Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. Baker v. Berry Hill Mineral Springs Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API