Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1996No. 64342, 67529PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Paul Brooks appeals a conviction and sentence as a prior and persistent offender on the charge of sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211 RSMo Cum.Supp.1991 and denial of Rule 29.15 post conviction relief after a hearing.

The only issue briefed for our review is a claim the motion court erred in not finding ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel’s careless closing argument opened the door for a response by the state that was otherwise unavailable. The direct appeal has been abandoned. See State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991).

The state proved the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. BooneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Watson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. TownesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. AbramsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API