Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1984No. 83-1018PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was tried on one count of destruction of property (misdemeanor). D.C. Code § 22-403 (1981). During the trial, the court declared a mistrial. Before the beginning of a retrial before the same judge, appellant moved to dismiss the information on the ground that double jeopardy barred a retrial. The court denied the motion and this appeal followed. 1 Appellant contends double jeopardy bars reprosecution because defense counsel neither requested nor acquiesced in the declaration of a mistrial and there was no manifest necessity for the ruling. We conclude that defense counsel implicitly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Davidson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Thuan Van LamHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API