Anderson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant was tried on one count of destruction of property (misdemeanor). D.C. Code § 22-403 (1981). During the trial, the court declared a mistrial. Before the beginning of a retrial before the same judge, appellant moved to dismiss the information on the ground that double jeopardy barred a retrial. The court denied the motion and this appeal followed. 1 Appellant contends double jeopardy bars reprosecution because defense counsel neither requested nor acquiesced in the declaration of a mistrial and there was no manifest necessity for the ruling. We conclude that defense counsel implicitly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Davidson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Thuan Van LamHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.