Eppens, Smith & Weimann v. Forbes & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Promissory notes. Principal and surety. Indorsement. Notice. Protest. Before Judge Harris. Troup superior court. November adjourned term, 1888. The official report is embodied in the decision
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
Langston & Woodson filed a creditors’ bill against J. C. Forbes & Co., alleging, in brief, that Forbes & Co. were insolvent traders indebted to Langston & Wood-son ; that the indebtedness was due, and demand for payment had been made after the same became due, *749and payment had been refused. The bill was amended by making various other charges, and at different times a number of new parties complainant were made. Among others, Eppens, Smith & Weimann filed their intervention, alleging that they were creditors ' of Eorbes & Co. in the sum of $1,518.34, with interest, on a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Camp v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Neal & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schillinger v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Mayer v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- McKibben v. Luther Williams Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Bryan v. WindsorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Cowart Co. v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.