Harjo v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBayless, C. J.
I dissent to the opinion of the court as expressed by the majority. I believe there are two fundamental errors underlying the court’s opinion. One involves an erroneous weighing of the evidence, and the other an erroneous application of well-known and easily understood rules .of law. I believe that a summarized statement of the positions of the parties will tend to throw much light upon the fraud that the court thinks was perpetrated upon the minor, and will also tend to emphasize the errors committed by the views expressed by the majority.
The whole tenor of the court’s opinion would lead one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Several Accountings of the Executors of TildenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Page v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Sawyer v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.