Legal Opinion

State v. Fain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1995No. CR21202; CA A81912Published

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He claims that the court erred when it granted the state’s motion to exclude the testimony of a defense expert. We review for abuse of discretion. See State v. Johanesen, 110 Or App 348, 351, 822 P2d 154 (1991).

On May 19, 1992, Deputy Johnston clocked defendant’s car traveling at 87 miles per hour in a 55-mile per hour zone. Johnston activated his overhead lights and stopped defendant. When Johnston approached defendant’s car, he smelled the odor of alcohol and noticed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JohanesenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API