Legal Opinion

Great American Insurance v. Queen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1978No. Docket 77-4457PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question in this case is whether a worker’s compensation carrier is entitled to be reimbursed from the injured employee’s recovery of noneconomic losses from the tortfeasors. The trial court held that they were not entitled to reimbursement and granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

Presently within this Court there exists a split of opinion on this issue. In Wrobel v Wayne County Road Comm, 79 Mich App 484; 261 NW2d 58 (1977), one panel of this Court relied upon the pre-no-fault case of Pelkey v Elsea Realty & Investment Co, 394 Mich 485; 232 NW2d 154 (1975), and held that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pelkey v. Elsea Realty & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reliance Insurance v. Messina Trucking, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Wrobel v. Wayne County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance v. QueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Foremost Life Insurance v. WatersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Foremost Life Insurance v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Logan v. Edward C Levy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. VancilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API