Legal Opinion

RADETIC v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 2011No. 1091462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

Anthony Radetic appeals from a judgment in favor of Michael (Mike) Murphy, Sr., Brenda Murphy, and The Eufaula Agency, Inc. 1 For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Pursuant to a divorce judgment, Mike Murphy and Brenda Murphy 2 were ordered to sell their marital home in Eufaula and to divide the proceeds. The Murphys hired the' Eufaula Agency, a real-estate agency, to assist with the court-ordered sale. Initially, the Murphys entered into a $600,000 contingency-sales contract with individuals who are not parties to the present action.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Raidt v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Georgia Lay v. Todd DestafinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API