Legal Opinion

Windsor v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1905No. 4957PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered July 8, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs for damages for breach of contract, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

The complaint alleges, in substance, the ownership of a certain quarter section of land; that appellant, being desirous of acquiring certain additional rights, agreed with respondents to put up suitable gates and fencing, and, in consideration of such agreement, respondents deeded to appellant seven acres of said land, all upon condition that said property should be properly fenced and proper gates erected, so that no damage could ensue to respondents by reason of cattle or horses straying upon said property; that, by reason of the failure of appellant to' erect said gates and build said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  3. Bowen v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  4. Hubbard v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Belden v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. DarnellWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Farley v. LettermanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Tate v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Zackovich v. JasmontWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. North American Transportation & Trading Co. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API