Legal Opinion

Edholm v. Idaho Irrigation Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

— Appellant is the owner of land and a water right under a Carey Act irrigation system constructed by respondent. His contract provides for the delivery to him of one-eightieth of a cubic foot of water per second per acre. In the summer of 1915 he suffered serious shortage of water and consequent loss of crops, damages for which he seeks to recover in this action.

The case was tried before a jury and a verdict returned for respondent. The appeal is from the judgment.

The errors assigned relate to the instructions and the admission of certain exhibits.

Instructions 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tapper v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meservy v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Preston v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rayborn v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API