Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnett Hollander, of the Will of Lester Field, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 1, 1957No. 246, Docket 24276Published

1DissentClark, Chief Judge

Judge Frank has aptly said that “some judicial legislation is one of the unavoidable facts of life.” Nevertheless he felt it necessary to couple this with the warning that “judicial law-making should always be cautiously employed and should be severely restricted in scope.” New England Coal & Coke Co. v. Rutland R. Co., 2 Cir., 143 F.2d 179, 189. So Judge Learned Hand puts it thus: “It is always a dangerous business to fill in the text of a statute from its purposes, and, although it is a duty often unavoidable, it is utterly unwarranted unless the omission from, or corruption of, the text is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Klein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Becker v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API