Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 29, 1948No. 6895PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

On October 29, 1948, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice caused a subpoena duces tecum to be issued, returnable on November 10, 1948, before the Grand Jury of this District, directed to “Elmer Casperson, a partner in O. Casperson & Sons, 340 Ninth Street, San Francisco, California” and requiring him to bring with him certain specified records and communications “exchanged by and passing between the addressee of this subpoena and employees and agents thereof” and certain designated persons and organizations concerning certain designated subjects. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. United States v. LawnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. United States v. Sam AchilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. Fielder v. Berkeley Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API