Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawn

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1953PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Motions by defendants (1) — To dismiss the indictments and information on constitutional grounds, (2) — To dismiss certain of the indictments for failure to state facts constituting an offense against the United States, (3) — For bills of particulars, and (4) — For orders requiring the production of certain documents for inspection. The Government opposes these motions and moves to consolidate the several indictments.

Defendants Giglio, Livorsi, Lawn and Roth allege the violation of their rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution by requiring them to testify…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. Vincent Moran DossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API