Heldenmuth v. Groll
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtConner, J.
A claimant harmed by a breach of an escrow agreement can pursue damages against an escrow agent for breach of contract, but damages for civil theft require more than proof of noncompliance with the escrow agreement. In the context of escrow agreements, damages for civil theft require allegations of knowing and intentional wrongful conduct. In this appeal, we address whether the trial court properly dismissed the counts alleging conversion and civil theft with prejudice, pretrial. After examining the four corners of the amended complaint, we affirm, without discussion, the dismissal of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gasparini v. PordomingoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Bell v. Indian River Mem. Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Masvidal v. OchoaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Gersh v. CofmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- O'DONNELL v. Arcoiries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by10 opinions
- TRANSCAPITAL BANK v. SHADOWBROOK AT VERO, LLC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Prou v. GiarlaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Chaput v. ScafidiSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- BLUESTAREXPO, INC. v. EnisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- Bankers Warranty Group, Inc., d/b/a Centricity v. Boom! Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.