People v. Pugliese
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The defendant, under indictment for arson of his automobile, had orally reported to the police that the car had been stolen. A few days later, as the result of an anonymous *480telephone call, the police became suspicions of him and asked him to come to the -precinct station house. The police detective in charge did not communicate his suspicions to defendant but presented to him a police department deposition (see Administrative Code of City of New York, § 434a-33.0, subd. c) which would confirm, under oath, the prior oral report of car theft. The defendant-was left alone to read and sign the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Merriweather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- People v. PutlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BalintAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.