Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tibbs v. Great Central Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1978No. 77-158Published

1Dissent

Mr. JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN,

dissenting:

Insurance policy provisions requiring proof of loss and limiting the time within which an action on the policy may be brought are inserted for the benefit of the insurer and therefore may be expressly or impliedly waived by words or conduct of the insurer inconsistent with an intention to demand compliance with such limitations. Since forfeitures of the rights of insured persons are not looked upon with favor by the courts, the doctrine of waiver has developed in order to avoid forfeitures in a variety of circumstances in which conduct by an insurer has…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. M.F.A. Mutual Insurance v. CheekIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Krutsinger v. Illinois Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Kenilworth Insurance v. McDougalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API