Legal Opinion

Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-058; CA A92655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of Linn Countys Goal 3 exception and comprehensive plan amendment, which allow respondent Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to construct a highway realignment on property of petitioners that is in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone and that is the subject of a pending condemnation action brought by ODOT. We affirm.

The controversy between the parties has been before us three times earlier. In Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn County, 121 Or App 561, 855 P2d 648 (1993), and Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn County, 117 Or App 390, 844 P2d 253 (1992), we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Schrock FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. ALL. FOR RES. LAND USE v. Deschutes Cty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API