Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Armour & Co.
Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions
Decided August 25, 1937Published
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, P. J.,
This case arises from an appeal from the judgment of Magistrate Dogole, in a summary proceeding, adjudging defendant Armour & Company guilty (and fining it $10 and costs) of selling a commodity marked with a false weight, under the Act of July 24, 1913, P. L. 965, sec. 5, which is as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, with intent to defraud:
“(1). To sell, or offer for sale, any commodity on the container of which is marked any false statement respecting the kind, number, quantity, weight, or measure of such commodity, or of any part thereof, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Com. of Penna. v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. GipnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Commonwealth v. CongdonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- City of New York v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913