Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Congdon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1920No. Appeal, No. 29PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal, No. 29, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Philadelphia County, Nov. Sessions, 1919, affirming judgment of magistrate, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Clemont H. Congdon. Appeal from summary conviction. Before Bregy, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court below entered the following decree: The judgment of the magistrate is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed. Error assigned was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The defendant was arrested upon a charge of having engaged in “an unlawful game, and a sport and diversion, upon Sunday, in violation of the Act of Assembly of April 22, 1794, 3 Smith’s Laws, 177,” and after a hearing before a magistrate was convicted and adjudged and decreed to pay the penalty by the statute provided. He thereupon presented his petition to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County praying for the allowance of an appeal from the judgment of the magistrate and the appeal was by the court allowed. The court, after a hearing, entered the following order:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GipnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. LevineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Com. of Penna. v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. BergenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. PeacockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Commonwealth v. NugentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API