Legal Opinion

Fried v. Fabiani

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1935No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The action below was assumpsit by the plaintiffs to recover from the defendants $148.35, with interest, as compensation due them under the provisions of a written contract of employment. It was tried before a judge of the municipal court, sitting without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiffs for the full amount of their claim; hence this appeal by the defendants.

The making of the contract, under date of September 12, 1933, for a term of five years from the first of that month, and its performance by all parties up to Feb ruary 19, 1934, were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Sullivan MacH. Co. v. Griffith, Rec.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. American Assembling MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Aufrecht v. Smoyer Brass Products, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1949
  4. Ben F. Levis, Inc. v. Axe's Department StorePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API