Legal Opinion

Allen v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1936PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action of contract upon a liability insurance policy. It was tried without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts, and concessions by both parties that certain witnesses, if present, would testify to certain facts, exceptions being taken to the materiality of the evidence. The court filed a finding of facts and rendered judgment for the defendant, and the questions before us arise on the plaintiff’s exceptions. It is agreed that if the plaintiff is entitled to recover, the damages are $3,300.

Holmes, a resident of Kansas, was motoring through Vermont, when his automobile broke…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Jacobs v. Loyal Protective InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Brown v. Bristol Last Block Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Labor, B.N.F. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Hale v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. DuryeaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Ins. Co. of State of Penna. v. PalmieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Weston v. Great Central Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. of TulsaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API