(PC) Harper v. Ramos
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC 8 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT 9 v. VARANASI’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED 10 DR. RAMOS, et al., (ECF No. 34.) 11 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 12 13 I. BACKGROUND 14 Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 15 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against 16 defendants Dr. Htay, Dr. Ramos, and Dr. Varanasi…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.