Legal Opinion

Butler County v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1929No. Appeal, 110PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

In 1904 the State constructed a bridge over the Conoquenessing Creek in Butler, and turned it over to the county. Appellant, a street car company operating its line in the county, desiring to cross the bridge, applied to the commissioners of the county for their consent; this was refused, and a bill in equity was filed in 1907 to compel the county to permit appellant to pass over the bridge. The court below granted the privilege on condition that appellant should “protect and preserve [the structure] and make all ordinary repairs.”

The bridge has been constantly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Passmore Williamson's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Lieberum v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Winton v. MorssSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Anthracite MinersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Comet Casualty Co. v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API