Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 28, 2006No. CIV. 01-551-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

On August 13, 2001, plaintiff Noye Miller filed this action against defendants United States and Delaware Transit Corporation (“DART”). (D.I.l) Plaintiff asserts a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., alleging defendants are liable for injuries he sustained while riding defendant DART’s bus. After an April 29, 2004 bench trial on the liability issues, the court found that plaintiff proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the negligent acts of defendants United States and DART caused his injuries and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Clements v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gramberg v. American Alternative Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API