Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Wooster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1935No. 25693. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

Ten cases in all were brought in King county involving substantially the same tax questions. It was stipulated by their attorneys and the attorneys for respondent, as county assessor of King county, that the two above entitled cases be consolidated for hearing, for the reason that they represent the two groups of cases involved in all the tax cases then pending in the lower court.

The first case, which we will refer to as the Ballard case, is typical of that group of cases where the matter was presented to the King county equalization board, and an appeal taken from that board to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Casco Co. v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Denny v. WoosterWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Showalter v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoosterWashington Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carkonen v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Adams County v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Roon v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Stryken v. PanellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API