Legal Opinion

In Re Fraser

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 16, 2000No. 5:98-cv-00045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FOLSOM, District Judge.

Before the Court is Private Counsel’s “Election Concerning Attorney Fees, Motion Concerning Election[,] and Withdrawal of Motion,” (Dkt. No. 89; 5:98-CV-270). Also before the Court is the State of Texas’s, the Texas Attorney General’s, and the Legislator’s (hereinafter the “State”) Joint Response to Private Counsel's Election, (Dkt. No. 92; 5:98-CV-270), and the State’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. No. 46; 5:98-CV-45). The Court, after considering the motions, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, enters the following order.

I

Background.

The above-styled matters…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Iron Arrow Honor Society v. HecklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rutherford v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Itt Rayonier Incorporated v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Total Rebuild Inc v. P H C Fluid Power L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API