Legal Opinion

Ford v. Bowden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1942No. 6 Div. 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The rulings on plea in abatement, replication and demurrer thereto are assigned as error.

The complaint was to the effect that the defendant wrongfully took possession of the body of his deceased sister and- wrongfully retained the same after due demand therefor.

To plaintiff’s complaint as last amended and each count thereof defendant filed a plea in abatement, charging, among other things, that plaintiff, prior to the time he brought his suit in the circuit court, had filed suit against the same parties for a like cause in another court. To this plea in abatement, plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. City of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Interstate Chemical Corp. v. Home Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Ex Parte Barclay-Hays Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terrell v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Price v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Simmons v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1979
  4. Worthington v. AmersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. C & S CONST. CO., INC. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API