Ex Parte Dunlap
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
This is an application for the writ of mandamus to require the judge of the Tenth circuit, sitting in equity, to vacate a decree awarding to petitioner’s wife alimony pendente lite and an attorney’s fee. The bill in this cause was filed for alimony without divorce (Hinds v. Hinds, 80'Ala. 225), and this application serves the purpose of an emergency appeal to review an interlocutory decree not otherwise reviewable. Ex parte Eubank, 206 Ala. 8, 89 South. 656; Brady v. Brady, 144 Ala. 414, 39 South. 237; State ex rel. Sellers v. Locke, 208 Ala. 169, 93 South. 876.
The main difficulty in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Lang's Heirs v. WaringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Brindley v. BrindleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Ex Parte EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Company v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Board of Education of Jefferson County v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Ex Parte State Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.