Legal Opinion

Cole v. Monroe County

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 9, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-CV-12928; Civil Action No. 18-CV-10410PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is presently before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment [docket entry 34]. Plaintiffs have responded and defendants have replied. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2), the Court shall decide this motion without a hearing.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are four retired Monroe County sheriff's deputies. They wish to carry concealed firearms pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act ("LEOSA"), 18 U.S.C. § 926C. Subsection (a) of this statute permits "an individual who is a qualified retired…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. GREWALDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022