Legal Opinion

Speigle v. Meredith

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided January 15, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

MCDONALD, District Judge.

This is a bill to quiet title. It states that George C. Speigle and John N. Stooekle. the complainants, are citizens of Ohio; that Solomon Meredith and Ira Jarrett. two of the defendants, are citizens of the state of Indiana; and that the residence of four other defendants, to wit: 'William A. Johnson, Martha V. Johnson, Thomas Ray, and Elizabeth Siver, is unknown. The bill also makes the Cincinnati and Chicago Railroad Company — an Indiana corporation— a defendant.

The bill charges that said railroad company, in May, 1S54, had occasion to borrow $150.000, to effect…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Polk v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Reed v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Newell v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Branch v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1866
  5. Herrington v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Tug River, Coal & Salt Co. v. BrigelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Mansfield v. District Agricultural Ass'n Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Sudduth Bros. v. Kyanite Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API