Legal Opinion

United States v. Quinones

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 21, 2017No. Case No. 16-cr-0223 (TSC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge

Before the court is Defendant Willie Quinones’ motion to compel the ‘Government to preserve evidence. At issue are three sets of biological evidence swabs: one set' taken from the Steak ’N Egg restaurant, the scene of the alleged crime; another set taken from a Lexus automobile; and a final set taken from clothing items seized during a search of the apartment where Quinones was arrested, which belongs to Quinones’s girlfriend. The Government notified defense counsel that the U.S. Attorney’s Office intended to authorize the consumption of all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. AusbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  4. United States v. KingsburyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API