United States v. Ismael Holguin Herrera
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Primarily at issue is the correct standard of review for Ismael Holguin Herr*884era’s sufficiency of the evidence challenge to his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) conviction (possessing firearms while “unlawful user” of controlled substance). AFFIRMED.
I
In a multi-count indictment against nine defendants, Herrera was charged in three: count 1, violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine); count 14, violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine); and count 16,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alex DandyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Chong LamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Baugham, ReginaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.