Legal Opinion

United States v. Ismael Holguin Herrera

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 26, 2002No. 00-51177PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Primarily at issue is the correct standard of review for Ismael Holguin Herr*884era’s sufficiency of the evidence challenge to his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) conviction (possessing firearms while “unlawful user” of controlled substance). AFFIRMED.

I

In a multi-count indictment against nine defendants, Herrera was charged in three: count 1, violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine); count 14, violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine); and count 16,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Alex DandyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Chong LamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Baugham, ReginaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API