Legal Opinion

United States v. Starr Renee Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1984No. 83-5051PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

Starr Renee Harris was convicted after a bench trial on two counts of possession of property known to be stolen from a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(c). Harris appeals her conviction on the grounds that she was tried in violation of the Speedy Trial Act’s 30-day minimum trial provision, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(2), that she was denied her fifth and sixth amendment rights to due process and effective assistance of counsel, and that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support her conviction. We find that Harris was tried in violation of the Speedy Trial Act, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Michael ArkusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Rojas-ContrerasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API